Figure 3b,c shows approximately 700-nm-thick TiO2 nanotube arrays. Figure 2 FESEM images of a Ti Ricolinostat order surface patterned with protruding dots and anodized for 1 min. The Ti surface was anodized at 60 V in an ethylene glycol solution containing 0.5 wt% NH4F.
(a) × 2,000 magnification, (b) × 15,000 magnification, (c) × 15,000 magnification, and (d) × 50,000 magnification. Figure 3 FESEM images of a Ti surface patterned with protruding dots and anodized for 2 min. The Ti surface was anodized at 60 V in an ethylene glycol solution containing 0.5 wt% NH4F. (a) × 1,000 magnification, (b) × 5,000 magnification, (c) × 15,000 magnification, and (d) × 50,000 magnification. Figure 4 FESEM images of a Ti surface patterned with protruding dots Galunisertib mw and anodized for 4 min. The Ti surface was anodized at 60 V in an ethylene glycol solution containing 0.5 wt% NH4F. (a) × 1,000 magnification, (b) × 5,000 magnification, (c) × 10,000 KU55933 chemical structure magnification, and (d) × 45,000 magnification. Figure 5 FESEM images of a Ti surface patterned with protruding dots and anodized for 5 min. The Ti surface was anodized at 60 V in an ethylene glycol solution containing 0.5 wt% NH4F. (a) × 1,000 magnification,
(b) × 4,000 magnification, (c) × 10,000 magnification, and (d) × 40,000 magnification. Figure 6 FESEM images of a Ti surface patterned with protruding dots and anodized for 7 min. The Ti surface was anodized at 60 V in an ethylene glycol solution containing 0.5 wt% NH4F. (a) × 1,000 magnification, (b) × 4,000 magnification, (c) × 10,000 magnification, and (d) × 50,000
magnification. When the anodization time was increased to 4 min, beautiful TiO2 micro-flowers started to bloom. The arrays of TiO2 micro-flowers are shown in Figure 4a. The thickness of each TiO2 nanotube is linearly correlated with the extent to which the TiO2 micro-flowers bloom. The blooming of the TiO2 micro-flowers is due to the severe cleavages of the TiO2 nanotubes between the top areas and the side walls of the protruding dots. As the anodization time was increased to 5 min, core bundles of nanotubes in TiO2 micro-flowers were slightly bent in random directions, as shown in Figure 5a,b,c,d. This occurred due to the difference in the growing speed of each TiO2 nanotube in the Racecadotril core bundles. The measured thickness of the TiO2 nanotubes in Figure 5d was 2 μm. As the anodization time was increased to 7 min, the center area of the core nanotube bundles in the TiO2 micro-flowers was removed, as shown in Figure 6a,b,c. Figure 6d shows the cleavage areas of the TiO2 micro-flowers. The structure of the TiO2 nanotubes in that area collapsed due to the additional etching by the fluorine ions in the anodizing solution. Figure 7 shows the schematic mechanism involved in the blooming of the TiO2 micro-flowers. One of the Ti-protruding dots from the photolithography and RIE process shows a cylindrical shape in Figure 7a.