Bat infection was screened with specific

Bat infection was screened with specific SBI-0206965 clinical trial molecular markers for each pathogen, as described in the Methods section. Table 2 displays the number of infected bats with H. capsulatum

in relation to the total number of each bat species sampled at different localities from the monitored Latin American countries. Detection of Pneumocystis spp. infection in the bat lung samples Of the 122 lungs that were molecularly screened for Pneumocystis spp., 51 bats generated sequences for one or both of the Pneumocystis molecular markers assayed. From these sequences, seven matched the mtLSUrRNA locus and another seven matched the mtSSUrRNA locus, while 37 sequences were generated at both loci. Pneumocystis spp. infection alone was found only in eight bats, corresponding to 6.6% (95% CI = 2.25-10.85%) of the total bats studied (Figure 1). Table 2 displays the number of infected bats with Pneumocystis spp. in relation to the total number of each

bat species sampled at different localities from the monitored Latin American countries. H. capsulatum and Pneumocystis spp. co-infection in the bat lung samples Of the lung samples from the 122 bats captured in Argentina, French Guyana, and Mexico that were molecularly screened for H. capsulatum and Pneumocystis infections, 43 samples revealed the specific sequences of each learn more pathogen, corresponding to 35.2% (95% CI = 26.8-43.6%) of the samples being co-infected with both pathogens in bats from the three geographical regions studied (Figure 1). Table 3 displays the number of co-infected bats with both pathogens in relation to the total number of each bat species sampled at different localities from the monitored Latin American countries. Table 3 Species, numbers, and geographical origins of the bats co-infected with H. capsulatum and Pneumocystis spp. Species Geographical origins/localities   Argentina (n = 21) French

Guyana (n = 13) Mexico (n = 88) Number of co-infected bats   TUC CBA Kourou CS MN GR HG MS NL (Total samples per species) Co-infection (total samples) A. hirsutus               3 (5)   3 (5) C. buy PF-01367338 perspicillata     0 (1)             0 over (1) G. soricina     1 (12)     3 (4)       4 (16) N. stramineus           1 (8)       1 (8) P. davyi           0 (1)       0 (1) P. parnellii           0 (2) 0 (1)     0 (3) M. megalophylla           0 (2)     0 (1) 0 (3) T. brasiliensis 8 (16) 0 (5)   2 (8) 2 (8)   3 (20)   19 (27) 34 (84) M. californicus                 1 (1) 1 (1) Number of co-infected bats (Total samples per locality) 8 (16) 0 (5) 1 (13) 2 (8) 2 (8) 4 (17) 3 (21) 3 (5) 20 (29) 43 (122) Abbreviations: TUC = Tucumán; CBA = Córdoba; CS = Chiapas; MN = Michoacán; GR = Guerrero; HG = Hidalgo; MS = Morelos; NL = Nuevo León. Finally, of the total number of bat lungs sampled, 106 (86.8%, 95% CI = 80.92-92.68%) were found to be infected with one or both pathogens, whereas 16 (13.1%, 95% CI = 7.22-18.

PubMedCrossRef 28 Fitzpatrick DA: Horizontal gene

transf

PubMedCrossRef 28. Fitzpatrick DA: Horizontal gene

learn more transfer in fungi. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2012, 329:1–8.PubMedCrossRef 29. Li JY, Strobel G, Sidhu R, Hess WM, Ford EJ: Endophytic taxol-producing fungi from bald cypress, selleck products Taxodium distichum . Microbiol 1996, 142:2223–2226.CrossRef 30. Kumaran RS, Muthumary J, Hur BK: Taxol from Phyllosticta citricarpa , a leaf spot fungus of the angiosperm Citrus medica . J Biosci Bioeng 2008,106(1):103–106.PubMedCrossRef 31. Gangadevi V, Muthumary J: Taxol production by Pestalotiopsis terminaliae , an endophytic fungus of Terminalia arjuna (arjun tree). Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2009, 52:9–15.PubMedCrossRef 32. Gangadevi V, Muthumary J: A novel endophytic Taxol-producing fungus Chaetomella raphigera isolated from a medicinal plant, Terminalia arjuna . Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2009, 158:675–684.PubMedCrossRef 33. Kumaran RS, Hur BK: Screening of species of the endophytic fungus Phomopsis for the production of the anticancer drug taxol. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2009, 54:21–30.PubMedCrossRef 34. Kumaran RS, Muthumary J, Hur BK: Isolation and identification

of an anticancer drug, taxol from Phyllosticta tabernaemontanae , a leaf spot fungus of an angiosperm, Wrightia tinctoria . J Microbiol 2009, 47:40–49.PubMedCrossRef 35. Tudzynski B: Gibberellin biosynthesis in fungi: genes, enzymes, TPCA-1 evolution, and impact on biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, 66:597–611.PubMedCrossRef 36. Hedden P, Phillips AL, Rojas MC, Carrera E, Tudzynski B: Gibberellin Biosynthesis in Plants and Fungi: A Case of Convergent Interleukin-3 receptor Evolution? J Plant Growth Regul 2001, 20:319–331.PubMedCrossRef 37. Strobel G, Yang X, Sears J, Kramer R, Sidhu RS, Hess WM: Taxol from Pestalotiopsis

microspora , an endophytic fungus of Taxus wallachiana . Microbiology 1996, 142:435–440.PubMedCrossRef 38. Kim WK, Mauthe W, Hausner G, Klassen GR: Isolation of high-molecular-weight DNA and double-stranded RNAs from Fungi. Can J Bot 1990, 68:1898–1902. 39. Cookson BT, Chen YC, Eisner JD, Kattar MM, Rassoulian-Barrett SL, LaFe K, Yarfitz SL, Limaye AP: Identification of medically important yeasts using PCR-based detection of DNA sequence polymorphisms in the internal transcribed spacer 2 region of the rRNA genes. J Clin Microbiol 2000, 38:2302–2310.PubMed 40. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R: Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947–2948.PubMedCrossRef 41. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S: MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol 2007, 24:1596–1599.PubMedCrossRef Competing interest The authors declare that they have no competing interest. Authors’ contributions ZQX collected plant samples and designed the experiments; YYY isolated and characterized of endophytic fungi. NZ performed fungal cultivation.