The control group was patients without cirrhosis. Pneumonia

vaccination was defined as receiving a single dose of Pneumovax at any point of time during the study period. Results The control group had 855450 adults and the liver cirrhosis group had 10430 patients. A total of 27 % of the patients in the liver cirrhosis group had the Pneumovax compared to 22 % in the control group (P <0.001). In patients older than 65 only 36 % had the Pneumovax in the cirrhosis group compared to 53 % in the no cirrhosis group (P <0.001). Conclusion To date this is the largest study evaluating up take of Pneumovax in the cirrhosis population. Despite the well-known benefit of the Pneumovax the prevalence of vaccination in patients with cirrhosis is dramatically low, especially in over 65's, although it is better than the general population, overall. Renewed vigor needs to be maintained in educating patients and physicians on selleck inhibitor the importance of vaccinating cirrhosis LY2157299 nmr patients Data presented as N (column %) with Pearson’s chi-square. Disclosures: Naim Alkhouri – Advisory

Committees or Review Panels: Gilead Sciences The following people have nothing to disclose: Tuyyab Hassan, Sulieman Abdal Raheem, Ripple Mehta, Omer J. Deen, Annette Kyprianou Background and Objective: New treatments offer greater potential to cure chronic hepatitis C viral (HCV) infection than ever before; however access to therapy is limited by subop-timal screening and the number of providers trained in HCV care. The Department of Health and Human Services has identified the need to build a workforce of providers capable of managing click here patients with

HCV infection; however, physicians often participate in education that reinforces what they already know versus that which addresses their true educational needs. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an online, personalized learning curriculum on improving physicians’ performance in HCV care. Methods: An online, case-based self-assessment (SA) was used to identify physicians’ individual practice gaps in the care of patients with HCV. Each SA question mapped to 1 of 5 practice gaps, each of which, in turn, corresponded to a distinct online CME intervention. Each physician was directed to one or more relevant CME interventions based on individual educational needs identified through the results of their SA. Each CME intervention included post-assessment questions matched to questions from the SA. Educational effectiveness was measured through statistical comparison between the SA and post-assessment data. Results: Initial data (November 19, 2013-March 06, 2014) reveal significant improvements from baseline with respect to: ▪ Recognizing the rationale for birth cohort screening (gastroenterologists, n=24: 33% vs 75%, P=.02; PCPs, n=174: 37% vs 52%, P=.02) ▪ Ordering the appropriate test to confirm HCV infection (PCPs, n=212: 79% vs 94%, P< .