For immunocytochemistry, the HSCs were cultivated in a differentiation medium and fixed and immunostained after 4 days with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and (tetra-methyl rhodamine isothiocyanate)-phalloidin (TRICK), as described previously [33]. Multinucleated cells containing more than three nuclei were considered differentiated osteoclast-like cells. The cell images were obtained by fluorescence microscopy. To confirm the viability of the differentiated

macrophages on nt-TiO2 and nt-TiO2-P, the cells after 4 days of culture were stained with calcein-AM and propidium iodide, as described in the section for the osteoblastic cell culture, and examined by fluorescence microscopy. Results and discussion

Crystal structure of TiO2 nanotubes and surface characterization of PDA-immobilized nt-TiO2 After anodization and annealing at 25 V and 350°C, respectively, the morphology of the highly ordered TiO2 nanotube array see more was examined by FE-SEM (Figure 2) to ascertain the nanotube dimensions. The mean outer diameters of the nanotubes were 100 nm. WAXD analysis (Figure 3) showed that the anodized nanotubes were amorphous, which transformed to anatase after heat treatment at 350°C [29]. Figure 2 Typical (a) surface and (b) AZD0156 price cross-sectional FE-SEM images of TiO 2 nanotubes. The nanotubes were formed at an applied potential of 25 V for 2 h in 1 M H3PO4 + 0.3 M HF solution at 20°C. Figure 3 XRD patterns of (a) Ti substrate 5FU and (b) heat-treated TiO 2 nanotubes for 3 h at 350°C in air. The nanotubes were formed at an applied potential of 25 V for 2 h in 1 M H3PO4 + 0.3 M HF solution at 20°C. ESCA was used to determine the immobilization of PDA on the nanotube surface (Figure 4). Table 1 lists the elements detected by quantitative analysis. The N 1s and P 2p photoelectron signal is the marker of choice for confirming PDA absorption. Three photoelectron signals were observed for nt-TiO2 (Figure 4,

curve x) corresponding to C 1s (binding energy, 285 eV), Ti 2p 3 (binding energy, 459 eV), and O 1s (binding energy, 529 eV). In contrast, five photoelectron signals were observed for nt-TiO2-A that correspond to C 1s, Ti 2p 3, O 1s, N 1s (binding energy, 401 eV), and Si 2s (binding energy, 154 eV). On the other hand, one additional photoelectron signal was observed for nt-TiO2-P, which was assigned to P 2p (binding energy, 133.7 eV). The very weak N 1s photoelectron signal observed for nt-TiO2 might be due to the entrapment of atmospheric nitrogen and impurity. The binding energies of the N 1s and P 2p photoelectrons obtained from nt-TiO2-P were assigned to NH2 − (400.6 to 401.9 eV) and PO4 3− (133.7 eV), respectively [34]. The presence of two new elements, N and P, in nt-TiO2-P confirmed the absorption of PDA on the nanotube surface. The morphology of the TiO2 nanotubes was not significantly changed after immobilization of PDA (Figure 5).