They were excluded if part of the nucleus was present in the last optical section (Spike et al., 2003 and Al-Khater

et al., 2008). We thank Mr. R. Kerr and Mrs. C. Watt for expert technical assistance, and the Wellcome Trust for financial support. “
“The authors have discovered an error in Figure 6 of their manuscript. The reference on line 4 of the legend should be “adapted from Shulman et al., 1997” instead of “Biswall 1995. “
“The values of Ganetespib nmr the statistical tests reported in the Source Estimation section (2.2.1, p. 76) correspond to log F-ratios and not to t-values. “
“The publisher regrets an error occurred in the final processing of Fig. 4M of the above manuscript. The correct figure appears below. “
“The authors would like to acknowledge that

this work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30471462). “
“The authors regret an error occurred in the editing process of Fig. 3 of the above manuscript. The correct Fig. 3 and figure legend appear below. “
“The corresponding author’s contact information was listed incorrectly. For the reader’s convenience, the correct email address is listed below for Dr. Koji Abe. In Fig. 3 on page 170, “Sema3A” and “Nogo-R” were missing in Fig. 3. For the reader’s convenience, the correct figure is reproduced here along http://www.selleckchem.com/products/fg-4592.html with its legend. “
“The publisher regrets an error occurred in the final processing of this manuscript. Co-author David Male has been incorrectly listed as A. David K. Male. The correct listing appears above. “
“The publisher regrets that the fifth author,

NADPH-cytochrome-c2 reductase Vicente Zanón-Moreno’s affiliation was printed incompletely on page 16. The affiliation denoted with superscript “c” should appear as follows: cPrevention Medicine and Public Health Department and CIBER Fisiopatologia de la Obesidad y Nutricion, Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. “
“Most readers of PAID will be familiar with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) and its final version the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS), (Eysenck and Eysenck, 1975 and Eysenck and Eysenck, 1991, respectively). They purport to measure the factors of Psychoticism (P), Extraversion (E), Neuroticism (N) and a Lie Scale (L), for descriptions of these see Appendix A. All of these have been shown to be reliable and valid in the UK. When several psychologists from other countries applied to use the EPQ we were presented with a dilemma. On the one hand we wanted them to have access to our questionnaire but on the other hand we felt uneasy for them to apply our UK norms and items without first standardising it in their own country.