However, when the interval between masked-prime and target is extended beyond ∼150 msec this usual positive compatibility effect (PCE) actually reverses to produce a negative compatibility effect (NCE; Eimer and Schlaghecken, 1998). Now, a target directing a left hand
response is actually slower if it is preceded by a (backward-masked) left prime relative to a right prime. As long as appropriate stimuli are used (see Schlaghecken et al., 2007; Lleras and Enns, 2004; Sumner, 2008), this NCE can be interpreted as reflecting automatic suppression of the primed response (see e.g., Eimer and Schlaghecken, 2003; Jáskowski, 2007, 2008, 2009; Sumner, 2007). According to these sensorimotor accounts of the NCE, initial motor activation evoked by the prime is subsequently suppressed when the prime is removed or a novel this website stimulus (the mask) is added to the scene (e.g., Boy et al., 2008; Jáskowski, 2007, 2008, 2009). This suppression means
that it takes learn more longer to initiate the suppressed response relative to a response which has not been inhibited, thereby producing the NCE. Sumner and Husain (2008) suggested that such automatic suppression of automatically evoked responses might be crucial for goal-directed behaviour because it frees an organism from stimulus-bound responses, and provides a level playing field for alternative actions to occur according to the current goals of an animal. Consistent with this proposal, Vainio and colleagues have reported that automatic inhibition is not restricted to masked-prime paradigms, but also occurs when responses are afforded by graspable stimuli (e.g., Vainio, 2009; Vainio et al., 2011; Vainio and Molecular motor Mustonen, 2011). Such considerations naturally raise the possibility of grasping behaviour in AHS arising from disruption of automatic inhibitory mechanisms which, in healthy observers, halt inappropriate activation
of responses afforded by the environment (see also Blakemore et al., 2002; Giovannetti et al., 2005). At present, however, there is very little direct evidence to support this hypothesis, although there are some suggestive pieces of evidence. In healthy adults, the supplementary motor area (SMA) in the medial frontal lobes is associated both with simply viewing graspable objects without reaching for them (e.g., Grèzes and Decety, 2002) as well as with successful automatic inhibition of primed responses indexed by the NCE (e.g., Boy et al., 2010a, 2011; Sumner et al., 2007). Intriguingly, AHS has long been associated with damage to these same medial frontal regions (e.g., Bakheit et al., 2013; Marchetti and Della Sala, 1998). AHS is increasingly recognised in corticobasal syndrome (CBS, to distinguish it from the pathologic entity, corticobasal degeneration, CBD; see Boeve et al., 2003). CBS is a rare (annual incidence rates have been estimated at around .02 per 100,000 individuals; Winter et al.