com/OE2.3/SampleSize/SSPropor.htm). The mean prevalence of adverse events was calculated as 8.2%, withdrawn from the CDC study.7 The following rules were used: population size: 7000; anticipated frequency (p): 8.2%; confidence limit: 2%; and design effect: 1. The selleck chemicals llc antigens for 2007/2008 influenza vaccine were A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1)-like strain, A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2)-like strain, and B/Malaysia/2506/2004-like Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical strain. These antigens complied with the WHO’s recommendation (northern hemisphere) and EU’s decision for the 2007/2008 season. The vaccine was supplied in pre-filled syringes containing 0.5 ml of vaccine. The trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine has an

efficacy of 70-90% in HCP aged 18-64 years when the vaccine and circulating viruses are antigenically matched. The efficacy is lower

when these two viruses are not well matched.1 Upon vaccination, a CDC staff completed a questionnaire regarding the demographic data of the participants. The process Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of the study and potential reaction were carefully explained to the participants. By signing at the end of the questionnaire, the HCP had agreed to participate in the study. This questionnaire was used to record any signs and symptoms, including fever or other adverse reactions (local or systemic) observed within a 14-day period after Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical vaccination, regardless of the severity of the symptom. The same questionnaire was used in the following 6 months. In the early follow-up period, all the health care workers were examined weekly by a physician, and all symptoms and abnormal physical findings during the prior days were reviewed and recorded. In the second part of the study, the participants were followed Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical up on a monthly basis by telephone and re-examined upon indication. Standard

definitions Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical for local reactions at or near the injection site were reviewed and used in our study as well as a guideline for case definition.8 Results Totally, 880 (94%) questionnaires were completed and returned in the first stage of the study and 851 (91%) questionnaires in the second stage of the study. In the first stage of the study, post-vaccination complaints were headache (5.3%), fever (7.9%), weakness Ketanserin (9.6%), chills (10.1%), sweating (10.5%), arthralgia (20.2%), and malaise (21.5%.( All the adverse events were mild. Swelling of the injection site was seen in 267 (30.3%) participants, and pruritus of the injection site was seen in 290 (32.9%) participants. Redness and induration were also reported by 374 (42.5%) health care workers (table 1). No significant systemic reactions were reported in the second part of the study. Eighteen persons reported transient upper respiratory tract symptoms and diarrhea during the second phase of the study, which potentially could not be related to influenza vaccination side effects in this phase. None of the participants experienced any inconvenience in part 1 or 2.