7 isoform and the toxin δ-AITX-Bcg1b had little effect in any of the seven isoforms tested, we restricted our detailed analysis only to the first six isoforms as outlined below in Fig. 2, Fig. 3 and Fig. 4. In Fig. 2 (for VGSC isoforms Nav1.5, Nav1.6 and Nav1.1) and Fig. 3 (for Nav1.4, Nav1.2 and Nav1.3) the voltage-dependent data (symbols) are shown in six plots each, where the two rows and three columns show results for the toxin types (CGTX-II at 5 μM, δ-AITX-Bcg1a at 1.9 μM) and channel isoforms, respectively. All the quantitative data are shown in Table 2 where the typical biophysical properties are reported together with this website the statistical significance of the differences observed for the action of the two toxins.
As illustrated in Fig. 2 upper panels, CGTX-II affects isoform Nav1.5 differently from isoforms Nav1.6 and Nav1.1. In Nav1.5 the effect consists in a right-shift of inactivation; on the contrary in both Nav1.6 and Nav1.1 the
effect consists in an incomplete inactivation from −40 up to +10 mV. The latter effect is due to a strong non-inactivating Ass component that increased in a voltage-dependent manner. The reason that is behind this action is shown in the inset of Nav1.1 isoform to Fig. 2 (upper-right panel) during the toxin action. The three superimposed traces elicited from −80, −35 and +10 mV, and immediately tested at −20 mV, show how the toxin exerts its effect by re-shaping the control steady-state inactivation and, Resminostat at the same time, producing a small left-shift of the activation that resulted significant MG-132 manufacturer only for some isoform (see Table 2). This type of action is able to strongly modify the so called “window current” that is know to be able to alter the neuronal resting potential [9] and [33]. Besides isoform Nav1.5, also isoforms 1.4, 1.2 and 1.3 (shown in Fig. 3) are much less affected by the 2 toxins and did show only marginal and sometimes not significant effects. We noticed also small, but significant (p < 0.05) effects of left-shifts of the voltage-dependent activation curves. CGTX-II produced very significant effects (p < 0.01) on inactivation in all isoforms except Nav1.2 and Nav1.4.
On the whole, these results suggest that the two different toxins were able to produce also different types of effects. Namely, it is possible to notice that CGTX-II was a toxin able to produce, only on the Nav1.5 isoform, a right-shift of the inactivation curve, whereas all the other effects consisted in a more or less non complete inactivation process. Our present data and those previously described [23] for other sea anemone toxins, namely ATX-II, AFT-II and BcIII, constitute a set of results obtained with native peptides and could thus be useful to be compared. In order to do so, we plotted the fractional slow component (As/(As + Af)) increase vs. toxin concentration for the six most affected isoforms, and in Fig. 4 a comprehensive dose–response summary is shown where also the data reported in Oliveira et al.