0 software package for Windows. Lodging resistance was used as the dependent variable, while lignin, cellulose, AOVB, NOVB, AOT and WOMT were used as independent variables. Potential microsatellite markers linked to stem solidness genes were identified by screening the F2 population using bulked segregant analysis. DNA was extracted from young leaf tissues using the CTAB method. The solid and hollow stem DNA pools were composed of 5 solid and 5 hollow stemmed F2 plants, respectively. Along with the parental DNA, the bulked DNA samples were used to screen 607 SSR markers (210 GWM [19] and 397 BARC [20]). The PCR mixture

(20 μL) consisted of 2.0 μL of 10 × buffer, 1.6 μL of Mg2 + (25 mmol L− 1), 2.0 μL of dNTP (2 mmol L− 1), 2.0 μL of DNA (10–20 ng μL− 1), 2.0 μL of primer (2 μmol L− 1), 0.2 μL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 check details U μL− 1), and 10.2 μL of ddH2O and was subjected to a thermocycler program of 94 °C for 5 min; NU7441 clinical trial followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, 60, 55, or 50 °C for 1 min (depending on each primer set), and 72 °C for 1 min; with a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 4% polyacrylamide gels and detected by silver staining [21]. Marker-trait associations were identified by single factor ANOVA and the proportion of phenotypic variation explained by single marker loci was determined as

the ratio of sum of squares for marker class divided

by sum of squares of entries [12]. The characteristics Selleck Lenvatinib of stem pith varied significantly among the four genotypes examined (Fig. 1). Solid stemmed XNSX showed the greatest amount of pith material (Fig. 1B), whereas CS and Line 3159 had hollow stems (Fig. 1A and C), and the characteristics of F1 plants were similar to the solid-stemmed parent except for the third and fourth internodes (Fig. 1D). Significant differences were also detected in the anatomical characteristics of the four genotypes, especially the transverse sections of solid stemmed wheat XNSX, which had more mechanical and parenchyma tissues (Fig. 2C and D) than the other three genotypes (Fig. 2A, B, E and F); F1 plants were almost intermediate between their parents in the corresponding values (Fig. 2G and H). The morphological data for the four wheat genotypes are shown in Table 1. AOT in the solid stemmed and F1 plants were significantly larger than that of CS. In contrast, there were only minor differences in AOVB among the four genotypes (Table 1). The widths of stem walls in XNSX and F1 were 2.7- and 2.6-fold that in CS, and WOMT values were 2.1- and 1.7-fold that in CS. Only slight differences were observed in TNVB among the four genotypes, but the WOL of XNSX and F1 plants were significantly higher than those of Line 3159 and CS (Table 1). The contents of cellulose and lignin showed slight differences among the four genotypes.