Particular focus is given to the emerging field of toxicoproteomi

Particular focus is given to the emerging field of toxicoproteomics, a new systems toxicity approach that offers a powerful tool to directly monitor the earliest stages of the toxicological response by identifying critical proteins and pathways that are affected by, and respond to, a chemical stress. The experimental design and the bioinformatics analysis of data used in our laboratory to gain mechanistic insights through expression proteomics into the responses of the eukaryotic model Saccharomyces cerevisiae

or of Pseudomonas strains to environmental toxicants are presented as case studies.”
“Objective. This study aimed to determine the relationship selleck screening library between third-molar juxta-apical radiolucencies and mandibular canals on panoramic and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images.

Study Design. Forty-two patients were included in this retrospective study. The root apices and the relationships of the juxta-apical radiolucencies to the mandibular canals were evaluated on both panoramic and CBCT images. The McNemar test (P < .05) was used to compare panoramic with CBCT findings.

Results. Root apices were visualized clearly check details with CBCT in most cases for which the apices were not seen clearly on panoramic images. Similarly, juxta-apical radiolucencies were separate from the mandibular canals with CBCT in most cases.

Conclusions. The present study found that there is no consistent intimate relationship

between juxta-apical radiolucencies and the mandibular canals. Similar studies with larger sample sizes www.selleckchem.com/products/azd1080.html are required to further confirm these findings.”
“Background: The optimal surgical treatment of patients with an unstable extracapsular

proximal femoral fracture is yet to be found. From the biomechanical point of view, the use of an intramedullary device in combination with a dynamic femoral head/neck stabilization implant seems an optimal technique. One of these intramedullary devices, the Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN), has several drawbacks in practice. The Proximal Femur Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) has been designed to address these. We hypothesized that the placement of one femoral head/neck fixation device in the PFNA would improve positioning of the implant in the femoral head compared with the PFN and reduce the number of reoperations in both short and long term.

Methods: We followed 157 consecutive patients with unstable trochanteric fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Osteosynthesefragen classification 31.A.2 and A.3) treated with a PFN or a PFNA for 1 year. The radiologic position of the implant was evaluated, and the postoperative local and systemic complications were registered.

Results: The position of the femoral head/neck stabilization implant was “”good”" in 39 (44.8%) patients in the PFN group and 23 (32.9%) patients in the PFNA group; the position was “”acceptable”" in 30 (34.5%) versus 33 (47.1%) patients, and in 18 (20.

Comments are closed.